Contact Us
SMICE Library
e-mail me





Last Updated: MARCH 1, 2020. First Edit : May 9, 2020

If you see ‘bad’ terms on the deal you are attempting , you are trading with an ill informed clowns may be assumed.Personal opinions  served without prejudice 


  2. Unless one is prepared to spend money on an ongoing basis  monthly  in keeping their site raking high,  establishing a website  has become an unviable waste of money for most PCT’s and others,  more so if using the iPhone , where  adverts  and links  now dominate. Small business people have become the ‘herd’ for  large corporations is now evident. If one has a web site , using it as a profile page and nothing more will do in keeping  the  name of the PCT online .  Google domination in this one market place  ‘as owners of the internet’ (by default ) it  has created an unfair and unlevelled  playing field and a ‘business within a business.’ If you have a website  and do not what to spend all day trying to keep your sites ranking high, sending  letters out directly to a supplier and end buyers is still an unknown but  highly effective if not superior method of sourcing. Use the  Internet and email system for matter of Due Diligence and Research . Find supplier  and names of those in charge, and write to them a personal one or two page  letter, stating what you are able to  for them. Now contact them by email i.e: six months  later when goods are secure ( and your trading  knowledge /skill has increased) citing  previous contact by postal hardcopy mail and  see the difference. FTN Exporting  does not  need the traffic today ; in its hey day, site rankings carried 200 million listing (2010)  without one cent being spent on SEO and add ons.This aspect all started to change from 2014.The internet has become a highly commercialises application. Billions of people cannot achieve a  first page ranking , thus only those who are  prepared  to pay money as an ongoing aspect can sustain such rankings,  has now become the norm–until law makers change the rules.  As for the deal itself, leading up to the offer stage is ( barely legal ) acceptable ; beyond that,  all contracts MUST still be issued as hardcopies. 
  4. A PCT cannot ply ‘investment’ projects, as a securities license or similar is required,  but a PCT  can ‘create’ investment projects for  ‘principals’ to consider ‘buying ‘ outright.  I.e: Crude oil is found on a land lease holder and /or owner . The owner  wants US$ 4.00 per BBL EXW before allowing others to extract the oil.The PCT finds and secures  the future extraction crew. The PCT works out all logistics for the goods to port and arranges port facilities. The PCT works out / negotiates  any royalty arrangement with the government  in return for an assurance  that export  license will be granted. The PCT also offers to secure ‘end buyers for  the purchaser’ of the project (agreed upon  commission rate nothing to do with the sale of the project) All cost are included to the higher end, plus i.e 5.0%  in where a healthy  gross profit is still very evident.  The draft edited and sanitised version is offered to potential ‘buyer/underwriters’ to instigate  ( to factor, convert to shares, or finance) .The purchaser will get this own experts to test the assumptions made. If accepted the original fully disclosed version is then sold via a hard-copy.The project  is sold for i.e: 2.0 percent of anticipated returns for sharing among all the entities assisting the PCT with the project.  Such deals takes years to produce and thus should not  be entered lightly.The PCT is offering a ‘ready to go now type  deal’ is the attractive aspect 
  6. In  recent times we have seen a rise of  both oil informed and informed trader attempting to conduct “off-take” type of deals which often could be construed as being investment deals. We give  the American’s  a ‘hats off’ for being innovative, and a ‘F’ minus for creating more flawed unworkables deals. What is a ‘Off Take’ deal.  Example: FTNX secure a large supply of crude oil  by  having an MOU or  Assurance of Supply, in where other ‘traders’ are offering secured goods, who in turns eventually offer it to the end user/end buyer. The ‘Off Take’ deal usually involves a “Seller” who is NOT the Supplier, but  who through a past deal(s)   has a ‘contact’ in the crude oil industry. Long strings are formed , everyone claiming they have supply, when at the end of it, there is no supplier, just a person who thinks they will be able to supply goods sought , on the condition it obtains the DLC. The  entity claiming to have an  ‘off take  agreement ’ then closes the deal with its suppliers, who has no idea that many others  have assisted in such a deal. Often one person ‘takes over ’ the supply from the person who secured  in  where long strings are formed.  All the known issues pertaining to ‘ill informed traders’ apply  with such deals. Disguising a standard safe practice to an unsafe one  does not  change the final effect to a favourable  event .  An Informed PCT ‘can also legally flip contracts’  but does it in a manner  that defines the position of an Informed PCT as being a principal as well as a Buyer or Seller. The FTNX doctrine of  trade applies international  trade procedures  and not localised procedures disguised to serve impression that an international trade deal is apparent.  In one recent offer provided to us by an informed PCT trying this  ‘unworkable aspect’, every well known disclosed entity that appeared on the document to support supply are well known circumventors going back decades. Non were actual suppliers. In the  FTNX  Doctrine, no two Sellers can work together on a deal, one Seller ‘has to step back’ as one Seller becomes the Principal and the other a ISS, when  a string trade is in effect. Changing the prior terms of reference, to an improper aspect  does not   change the scene. One who has signed an ‘Off Take’ supply agreement , cannot sell good to another ‘ person’  who then offers ‘an off take’ supply /agreement to others down the line. These ‘back to back’ deals cannot work applying matters of Doctrine , even though it’s obvious  aspect of such procedures are apparent in some of these deals. Bank will not accept ‘funding’ such deals as well.  This is just one reason why FTNX does not entertain  supporting others. Some  have studied ITSI and added  their own added terms thereon  without understanding  that a flawed aspect has been created. Furthermore we cannot accept  transhipped goods nor are able to transfer a DLC down  a long line of traders acting on the original ‘off take’ deal. Also note: When circumvention is apparent  an ‘ intermediary type of trader’ taking on  export ready Supplier  will often be required to stand before a ‘Federal ‘ type of court hearing,  will often fail to win such a case because  the plight of the  jilted intermediary usually cannot be heard in  a ‘Federal’ court , but by a lower state administered court and jurisdiction therein. This adverse aspect is not apparent when the PCT acts as a ‘Seller /Buyer’ and Professional Commodity Trader. A ‘PCT”  acting as Buyer  can take a supplier to a higher court on equal merit .  
  8. Other aspect of breaching  solicitation laws may also become apparent  with the above aspect,  and trading in general. A Seller with supply secured prior  of i.e:  D2 contacting a potential end buyer/user  is not in breach of  solicitation laws. An entity  without a supplier/supply , offering to provide supply of goods not  ascertained  prior, on the hope the buyer takes an offer for goods or services yet to be secured, is  breaking solicitation laws and may attract related criminal charges for deception and or fraud.  i.e: Localised example:  Seller cold calling by phone: “We are able to provide you better electricity rates” can be counteracted quickly by asking “who is your supplier.”  When no  answer is forthcoming , then you know  that the caller is not even acting as a disclosed broker for known supplier. Same kind of aspect applies in international trade deals. Many ill informed traders are offering goods they don’t actually have secured in any form,  in a hope they secure an end buyer  first , then look for supply later. A seller who has secured i.e D2 offering such to an end buyer/user  is not ‘soliciting’  but rather id offering an  ‘invitation’ for the buyer  and end user to consider buying what is  actually on offer. 
  9. ICPO
  10. IRREVOCABLE CORPORATE PURCHASE ORDER: This is not an international trade term and should not be used. Often  seen used by ill informed Traders. Appropriately used often in USA as a localised or interstate business  practice. A Professional Commodity Trader (PCT) signing an ICPO  in the same USA State as a  USA supplier who fails to perform  locally or interstate go could find  themselves in serious legal hot waste due to the term ‘irrevocable.’  A PCT acting as buyer cannot be irrevocably bound to perform all  because an offer was sought from a  supplier. Internationally  ICPO is used to describe business  of Interpol  ( International Criminal Police Organisation). ICC Paris, France has also expressed concerns that  corporations and private traders  are using localised terms such as ICPO extraterritorially.’ 
  11. BROKER
  12. Person acting on behalf a disclosed principal is a broker. I.e: working for an insurance company,  Brokerage firm..etc..etc. A trade Intermediary is not a broker nor agent unless they represent a named other.   A PCT can act as a highly informed agent  or  broker for another when not trading as a lone PCT , thanks to the FTNX study ; once they learn in-house routine in where a PCT could  bring to the table  formidable advice as well, an aspect that most principals appreciate.
  14. An (ill informed) intermediary in general  is neither an Agent, Broker or Principal. Such is a person  undisciplined  in commercial practices who acts as a third party in a three  party deal in where a reward or commission is offered to person who surrenders vital information to a principal or others in return for a payment. An opportunistic person, attempting  to secure a commission called a ‘spotters fee’  in an ‘ad hoc’  manner. An ‘informed’ Intermediary who later turns ’professional’ after time spent in studying  and practicing the FTNX doctrine and trading process  is defined as an independent  PCT trading as a  ‘Buyer’ or ‘Seller.’ In International trade business there is no scope for ill informed intermediaries to exist let alone trade effectively if they do not convert there trading position to a PCT.  We have to learn how  to trade as a ’buyer/seller’  and PCT or not at all.  The PCT also learns matters of agency and the PCT  learns how to apply matters of contract on big transactions , whether  on  commodities or investment projects, the same international aspect of doing business is evident in the doctrine. To remain as a ‘intermediary ‘ while trading internationally is a very long road that leads to a dead end.  The home based Intermediary studies the doctrine for about 3 month , then instantly sheds the intermediary tag  for the PCT  and ITS tag there after.  
  15. MT799
  16. A  device generated ‘Message Text’ (MT)  were the open aspect of such, allows one bank using Internal secure means; to send a message to the another participating bank world wide.  MT 799 Is not a  text related to the issuance of a DLC, ( and yet we see this mistake the most often)   but  merely an ‘advice’  being served from one bank to another. I.e:  a ‘Bank Comfort Letter’ is  being electronically   advised stating that the Buyer is RWA to the bank of the Supplier. It does not mean that the Buyer will ‘buy’ anything, nor does it binds the buyer to perform. BCL cannot be used or issued  by the PCT as we are traders not end users of the products we buy and later sell. 
  17. LOI
  18. In international trade business ‘LOI’ stands for ‘Letter of Indemnity’ and   not ‘letter of intent.’ The LOI serves  no value in this business. Usually found as I flawed  procedures via :  LOI, ICPO, BCL, PB.etc.etc.  combined aspect.
  19. ASWP
  20. ANY SAFE WORLD PORT: Incoterms  requires  that the name port  of destination must be indicated so that an accurate assessment of carriage rate can be served. Offers carrying ASWP  may also indicate that the goods have been ‘marked up’ dramatically as well. What is indicated when such a term is applied  is that the trader is ill informed. Import Customs will not tolerate such aspect either. World scale rates are use when assessing freight values.
  21. POF
  22. Proof of funds (POF) is another idiotic ill informed aspect applied by those ill informed.  So Shell, BP etc.etc. who also buy petroleum based  products contact the PCT to look at what they have to offers, and the PCT ask for POF  upfront, the deal will end there and  then. Each aspect of a deal is treated independently, As each aspect is concluded, a new aspect appears, as will matter of payment. A ‘person’ can flash all the money they like upfront - but unless an offer and subsequent contract is signed first, suing a principal for failing to perform, cannot occur. Failure  to perform in this context,  means that a ‘breach of contract ‘ has become evident, in where the breach was specific to ‘payment not being made.’ Idiotic clowns acting as ill informed intermediaries have not idea about such matters.      
  23. THIRTY (30%) DEPOSIT
  24. No funds must ever be presented up front in any form whatsoever under any circumstances of a legitimate first run deal being sealed. With COVID 19 scenario, face  mask manufacturers have been demanding up to 50%  upfront payment, all because someone is asking for a quote or offer.  If anyone asks for any money upfront, being it a deposit, fees,  charges or the likes; RF the deal immediately. Having said  that Chinese ‘Traders’ will often ask for a deposit up front; but after a first challenge after serving the trader a quick lesson on acceptable safe procedures,  they soon come to understand that their requests is one that a scam artist would make. Legal  Frustration where a buyer has shifted the deal so far on each demand made, in where a third offer has been produced, the offer may accompany a demand  for a  performance deposit, is the time such a deposit may be sought.  The type of deposit that will stop another offer being issued  in where  if the buyer fails to enact on the deals the deposit is forfeited.
  26. ‘Please advise contract to our bank’ means’ a Rubbish fodder (RF) deal in apparent. Banks have no part is matter of the contract. Banks deal in finance not products. This is a  major rule under universally applied UCP 600 Banking rules. Suppliers must always beware of such a request from a  person calling themselves ’buyer’
  27. SLC 
  28. Buyer beware! A SLC is never used to pay for goods and a deal is dropped is this payment instrument is sought. An SLC can be transferred  many times or not  transferable  at all, depending on the rules supporting its issuance. An SLC is ideal for using in support of a P.G or when paying rebates, fees and commissions. A DLC is a conditional instrument meaning that certain conditions must be met before collection can apply. This make the DLC a deferred payment application. An SLC however bears an unconditional aspect where the production of a drivers license proving I.D may be all that is required to initiate collection–instantly.  An SLC can be collected  unconditionally and DLC  cannot. A PCT of sound mind would never seek nor issue and SLC for payment of goods  ordered.
  30. The buyer must alway must  issue the financial instrument  to pay for goods first. The supplier counters this act with  the issuance  of a SLC in support of a performance guarantee–when such a P.G is offered. This aspect  MUST never be applied the other way around , useless  one is keen to lose their money  and the deal. We won’t elaborate more on this part  in case scam artist are reading this site. A supplier must  never offer a P.G first on the lure of a lucrative deal, is our clear advice. The P.G is only forfeited  if the supplier through his fault failed to have goods at port to enact delivery on time. The term ‘BOND’ is an ugly  improper term and should not be used. 
  32. The main stay of any international trade transaction is the well defined offer. The universal practice is that there is no contract unless an offer has first been signed. Unless stated differently on the offer itself , in International trade  the offer once signed  is accepted as legally binding. From the supplier its called an offer, from the  end buyer or PCT it’s an  ‘Offer to Procure.’ The offer is the bedrock as such supports the whole ‘deal’ and destroys deal if presented ambiguously. An offer is presented in an expressed formatted pointed letter style using Georgia, Times or Arial fonts.The is no legal contract without an offer  first being signed as accepted is a  FTNX golden rule. The offer MUST  ONLY personally be served from  the named supplier in possession of goods, or its authorised agent/broker  disclosing the supplier.  B2B platforms, mailing lists , trading sites  should not  be used to claim that supply has been secured. 
  34. A quote is ‘confirmed’ rather than accepted and has no legally binding aspect like that of the offer. A quote is a good document to service as the deal can be tested with a supplier or end buyer long before a deal moves into ‘deeper waters.’ 
  35. R.W.A
  36. ‘Ready Willing and Financially Able’ is a Bona fide trading and legal  aspect .The buyer must have funds secured prior to placing an order rather than before considering to place  order. The supplier must have finances  in place to export goods being sold. Just like a PCT the buyer must open a bank account to handle the DLC aspect of business ; but if a buyer is looking to  finance an export deal, then the loan application  has nothing to do with the underlying import contract itself. When the end buyer has  become RWA it means that the PCT has received the required DLC to pay for goods; until this happens no RWA is apparent as per the perspective of the PCT. A BCL serves this aspect well when an end buyer deals  directly with a suppliers directly located in the same country or are using the same kind of bank, and only after the offer is accepted. A PCT simply asking for a quote or offer , does not  means a ‘show of fund.’ The offer has to be accepted first to ensure  a legally binding aspect is first apparent. A  PCT who signs the offer of a supplier is one who already has secured the required funds to pay for goods by the time the contract is signed. ABCL could then be offered via SWIFT; but since the PCT is signing the contract, and payment instrument is to follow within 7 days there after, the expense of secure such a BCL /  SWIFT is an expense of the supplier , if he is not prepared  to wait for the contract to be signed and returned. 
  38. FTN EXPORTING definition for  purpose of clarity and study. Entity who has  ‘as owner in possession of export ready goods and the property in them ‘ who makes the offer. A Seller (PCT)  is one who sells title  to goods but does not take possession of them .
  39. END BUYER 
  40. FTN EXPORTING definition for  purpose of clarity and study. Entity who is   ‘the end  buyer paying for and taking possession of imported  goods and the property in them.’A ‘Buyer’ like FTNX is one who ensures payment is made to its Supplier, in where it ‘buys’ title  to the goods  but does not take possession of such goods, and ships such purchased goods directly to the end buyer,  from country of origin.  
  41. PCT
  42. FTN EXPORTING definition for  purpose of clarity and study as it applies to the emerging industry it  has created. Professional  Commodity Trader (PCT) is neither intermediary, broker, agent, supplier or end buyer, but a highly informed, experienced,  disciplined, and educated  professional ‘Buyer  or  Seller’ of commodities  at any given time  who is  also specialised at what they do; who has developed a skill set and discipline required  to flip over a contract from once side to another using a legal and lawful application to do so  under a set of  standards, rules and laws. A person undertaking the principles of leverage and arbitrage. A PCT instigates the deal thus cannot be deemed to be an  ‘Ad Hoc’ intermediary nor an ISS member. A PCT is therefore ta ‘first party trader ‘ and principal in their own right who created the ensuing deal.In default the PCT  has secured a new market for the supplier, font thing months or year to do so. A PCT working alone on its own deals , is the prime trading aspect in where the greatest position to close on such deals prevails. This aspect greatly diminishes  when  the PCT  trades often/always with string members. 
  43. LIEN (Caveat)
  44. A right to keep possession of property belonging to another person until a debt owed by that person is discharged. Usually an unseen aspect found in ‘many places’ when applied in International trade matters, in particular to  (carrier)  rights to sell goods for unpaid freight. In 2018 a new aspect has become apparent in that a lien should not be  relied upon then applied against goods which at  one moment are apparent  in where  when such  goods  once  used, destroys the lien attached. A  lien thus should not be deemed to  stand on the same platform  like other  types of  offered security or collateral. 
  46. It has come to light is a recent court case that;  ‘an original document once sent by email’ could be deemed in a dispute  as not being an original document, because it becomes an altered document when Meta Tags are added. In an FTNX  ICA ( Instantaneous Contract Application )  adding a term such as “ This document is an original document once sent by email after meta tags have been added” solves this legal issues.  FTNX had raised this issue ten year ago in that i.e: “a bank offering a credit card online’ has no legal offer because the original acceptance  was qualified due to the addition of meta tags and lack of an original signature.  
  47. AT SIGHT
  48. Terms used by the issuing  bank of the end buyer to ‘visually  sight’  delivery document before payment is released to the seller or supplier  in where any anomalies can stop payment until the issue(s)  is resolved  or;  a waiver from the end buyer is provided to the bank  as indemnity against legal action. Only matters applied  on the terms and conditions on the DLC  and not contract  are checked ‘at sight ‘ and affirmed based on a  set of protocols and rules that must apply before collection process may proceed.  i.e: A  Charter Party BOL is presented where under UCP rules the bank of the buyer can only accept the more secure and costly  Shipowners BOL etc..etc..In where the credit terms require a PSI certificate to be issued by SGS in where a BOV Certificate is provided instead will require a waiver from the buyer before payment can be made.Many such aspects  must be apparent;  is the added security feature  using UCP IDLC. When  a document does not  comply or has been altered  it is said to be presented in an ‘unclean’  state. Waiver are best avoided at all times as waiver ‘opens the door’  for the buyer to make added demands in contrary to the contract basis.   Waiver and amendments also cost money.  
  50. The delivery of original  documents and not the physical goods  when presented cleanly activates collection process. Even at DAP Incoterms; and  even though delivery of goods must apply to an  agreed place, often at buyers factory in another country, the documents  supporting such are still required to be presented in a ‘Clean’ stated before collection process  may  apply. In FOB, CFR or CIF, once the goods clear the ships rails  in good condition port of loading the risk passes to the end buyer who now owns the goods.  Again we have seen many stupidly inspired  interpretations of the delivery aspect. The  supplier  wants to be paid before  the goods being sold  no longer belong to him. How clear is that? No supplier in their right mind will allow  a DLC or payment  to be lodged  after the goods have arrived at destination port. It’s just commonsense, regardless of the  payment method used. To do so means the end buyer can obtain the goods and the supplier never paid. There is not even a claim for payment, if the end buyer takes the goods and coverts it to another product, before payment is collected. IN FACT    it could be successfully argued that goods delivered at DAP Incoterms or where deferred payment are apparent, an in where a failure of payment has occurred, the supplier  could not  make a demand for good to be returned or even seized, if the goods have been converted to another product.  A supplier may not even have a case  for payment, if the goods as sold under a lien, no longer exist.   Only  principals who have conducted business with each other  many times  prior can apply less formal terms of contract.  Hence a intermediary seizing such a contract could get the impression that such relaxed terms of a contract could be applied in its own deals. 
  52. ‘Carriage and Insurance Paid’ (CIP) and ‘Free Carrier’ (FCA) are used for FCL (Full Container Loads) sales  and not FOB, CFR or CIF. Light product needing volume to initiate good weight  often use 40 FT FCL.Dense material often use a 20FT FCL .Both containers have weight limits imposed on them in where all because one can sell  20 MT of I.e: Copper Cathodes via a 20FT FCL . The will not be able to fill a 40FT FCL with 40 MT of Copper. All Containers have their TARE weight  and the maximum net weight printed  on the door.This does not infer that ALL Port will however accept such weight. The supplier and end buyer need to be informed about such matters before contract  are sealed   
  53. FCL
  54. Full Container Loads; come it all kind of sizes to include cradles and freezers (Reefers) and in where bladders are used for  bulk liquids, and ‘Hot Tainers’ with heaters for bitumen. 20 foot and 40 foot lengths  are more common lengths. 40 Ft  Containers are often  used when product carry volume but are light i.e: bales  of wool, novelty items , mixed products.
  55. CFS
  56. CONTAINER FREIGHT STATION :Area near or along side Port of loading or unloading  inside customs  control.  One set of charges apply from factory to CFS, and a charge for  lifting and unlifting  to and from ship, and another charge for storing, moving around, at CFS via place of loading and unloading, deceptively  makes up the full freight and delivery  cost  component, even though most charge only refer to the ocean going component. Added costs pertaining to  matters of Quarantine, Currency fluctuations, and late returns of empty container to CFS  storage depot may also apply to produce a vey large  total cost of final delivery. In 2020, Incoterms  2020 has extended the FCA Incoterms aspect to included localised delivery  not to a ‘CFS.’ FTNX remains with the original CFS delivery aspect. 
  58. Lots of  confusion applies to such matters often seen on speculative trading boards or industry advice  in where if such boards or advice explained their processes they use   better more investors  would be secured.   CIF Rotterdam, CIF EU,  CIF  Laverna.. etc. means to   define that the goods ordered are delivered to named destination ports., where the end buyer arranges freight to destination.The Buyer is not receiving a CIF quote to final destination, but is being advised that the  freight component  in getting  the goods to the named pickup port, will still need to be paid , when the buyer picks up such good from such named  ports/places. i.e: Freight component from Russian Port to Laverna, Italy. The freight component from Russian port to Laverna is still payable , even though  the goods are offered at FOB Laverna. 
  59. LAY CAN
  60. All major ports have berthing schedules  where booked  vessels are expected to arrive at a designated berthing time, where the ship can either  unload or take on loads.  If the buyer fails to   have goods ready to load when Lay can is taken, the supplier loses its P.G . 
  61. NBC 
  62. NON BREAK CARGO: The rule here is one whole bulk carrier shipment , one BOL applies, as delivered to one port to one buyer, whereas 50 FCL , 50  different buyers and 50 sets of BOL’s are served to many buyers at the same POD (Port of Destination) 
  64. A charge payable to the owner of a chartered ship on failure to load or discharge the ship within the time agreed. Thus the ship has missed lay can  and needs to ‘park offshore’ until next berthing the is secured will also need to pay cost of such delays accordingly. 
  66. Another misunderstood concept:  A buyer states that they want to buy a product using a ‘Bank Guarantee’ in where  no payment can be collected  until  the goods arrive at destination as per CIF. The buyer is not understanding  that  if a seller is unable to obtain his money owning when goods are loaded on board a ship port of loading, then it’s not longer (a) a CIF transaction but a ICC  DAP Incoterms  delivery mode  and that (b) Interest is also applied on to the agreed payment value  as a premium and (c)  a Guarantee in the form of a SLC should not be used for  such a transaction.A Bank guarantee as advised by  a bank in another country  is a risky proposition  and should never be considered  as payment because laws and rules retaining to this kind of Guarantee apply localised banking rules and laws.  The correct credit is a  DLC  for delivery as DAP Incoterms ,  as a DLC is an internationally acceptable instrument. This one aspect   assures that once the required delivery documents   are presented, the supplier is guaranteed payment under the DLC once 30 days after delivery has completed.We have seen entities who should have known better seek such B.G. A Bank guarantee must not be used for payment of of goods. 
  68. As for deferred payment,  a Negotiating and Confirmed DLC must be secured and interest  be calculated in the offer price. Here the supplier bank if accepted, will discount the value of the DLC and pay the supplier accordingly then collect on the  whole DLC value later when  bank seeks reimbursement.  But the end buyer has to pay a higher rate if the seller is not going to collect on documents at a later date (D/A)  or collects on such but defers collection. The Buyer is using the sellers ‘money’ to do business–hence such deals attract higher sell prices. 
  70. A barge or an other  vessel  loading a mother ship offshore  will produce a trans-shipped BOL , which is not allowed to be used under a UCP DLC application is another security feature of using a UCP endorsed  DLC. A PCT cannot  trade in transhipped goods.
  72. This issue remains in place. In 2019 we are still  receiving inquiries for goods offered 12 months earlier as submitted by ill informed others. So a genuine  offer once released even though long expired or sold  can  and will often travel around the world many times due to  ill informed  intermediaries trading in such documents. This matter makes the work of legitimate PCT traders even  more difficult.
  74. This is an important date. If an offer is not returned on time, the basis of the original  offer may change is a second offer is sought.   
  76. While national news stories sensationalise such matters, In fact ‘scam artists’ have been around long before FTNX started in this business in 1988  when using a facsimile. Most scam artist use a non ISP services email address is a common feature.The other is the use of in particular platforms such as ‘Facebook’ in where scam artists conduct business openly to prey upon gullible victims. Scams involving romance, SLC financial instruments, drug trafficking, money laundering, compassionate requests for money, fake product..etc..etc..are common. In the commodity trading  business as advised  in the FTNX  Doctrine of Trade, such matters are not an issue and easily discovered, if one follows its advice.  An internet  study offered in primary schools  would reduce  the ability of scam artist greatly. The Internet is a dangerous place, more so if one is naive. It’s not so dangerous when  natters of due diligence are always apparent.  
  78. Quote, Offer, Contract, DLC, P.G, Delivery, Collection, Next Delivery. Any strange requests of improper aspect  or allowable variants offered are dismissed. This is the basic formal and formidable safe trading aspect applying to any  straight forward  commodity  transaction. Any demand for upfront payments, or mention of  incorrect  terms of reference seen herein, the nature of business is dismissed. Goods must be secure first. Once secured the PCT acting as buyer reverts  to the position of  ‘seller acting on behalf of an undisclosed principal .’ The seller is affirming to the buyer ‘WE HAVE SECURED A PRINCIPAL SUPPLIER’ which we do not want to disclose yet. This affirmation if falsely made, could wreck a potential  good deal later, as the irrevocable status of a DLC could only  be made revocable by the issuing bank  if a fraudulent event is later detected.  Above is the routine when a PCT is dealing directly as a buyer/seller with no string participants  apparent. Matter of commons payment have to be added  to the routine once string members  are involved  which makes the deal much more complicated. This is why a PCT should consider avoiding forming string deals and learn how trade alone.
  79. P.O.P
  80. The term ‘Proof of Product’  when asked for is  another  improper term. If an  end buyer does not  under an invitation, meet the supplier and discuss business and sight goods in suppliers country, no such POP is possible until goods arrive at destination port.  But even if an end buyer went to such a meeting it  could lose the right to reject  goods when they arrive at destination port, because end buyer   has already ’seen and accepted’ the goods being loaded,  when visiting the supplier. (Legal maxim: Caveat Emptor: Buyer Beware) This is why third party independent inspector are important. An End buyer sighting such  goods, cannot possibly know what the inherited properties are ‘just by looking.’ Independent inspector however can, by conducting tests only ON THE GOODS  being sold, and not as per goods sold to someone else previously as specified on some other buyers  report.  How it applies to the end buyer so does it apply when a  PCT is offering goods. There is not valid issue  nor  valid evidence  that the goods sighted at port of loading will be the same quality of goods that will arrive. Independent experts must attest to goods at port of loading. The PCT still has discretion to service evidence of  his ‘supplier’ ,even  after the DLC has been accepted, because the PCT regardless what laws are in effect  is the ‘Seller’ under any system of  law  once the position is declared, and is not required to provide such evidence; evidence for goods that the end buyer could not secure ( otherwise why use the services of the PCT) nor secure at the price offered by a PCT. POP excuse is sought by circumventors, because one cannot give proof of goods but only evidence of supply, by disclosing  the details the suppliers. 
  81. DLC
  82. The use of  a DOCUMENTARY LETTER OF CREDIT (DLC) as endorsed under UCP rules as administered by the ICC Paris, France, is the safest payment advice one can use, because it comes with a whole lot of  conditions,  that must be satisfied first. This is a why a SLC MUST never be used to pay for such goods as a SLC has no or very little conditions  to apply collection on such payment instruments. An end buyer  who cannot open a DLC, is deemed as not being an end buyer at all. A DLC is opened as ‘irrevocable’  meaning  that the issuing bank will honour payments on behalf of its customer, the end buyer, even if the end buyer protests. Because there is a long period of time between issuance and collection, if the required  transport documents are not produced, or  do not comply, no payment can be collected. Furthermore if it is found that fraudulent dealing are apparent , this is the one act that can cause the irrevocable status of a credit  to become revocable  instantly. When a contracting period is lets say  60 days, any fraudulent dealing would be soon discovered in the course of the transactional basis. Thus a PCT cannot deal in on the spot products, but products sold at a FUTURE date, adds to the overall unseen security feature of the DLC.  We have seen may stupidly ill informed payment methods and excuses therein. As far as the PCT is concerned it cannot accept any other payment instrument  but a fully active  IDLC carrying an ‘at sight’ collection process. We MUST apply the delivery modes that are  connected to the current set of international  banking rules  as defined under ICC UCP 600.This is what some PCT’s have not understood. A supplier working directly with an end buyer to close upon a commodity transaction MAY APPLY  whatever payment method  suits them; the law books are full of such misadventures. We cannot and must  not emulate such bad practices. We can only apply current 2020 or 2010 incoterm delivery rules, in where  the payment aspect  and collection aspect then applies current  banking rules (UCP 600). We cannot for instance apply  banking rules prior  (UCP500)  because such banking rules changed  in 2007. We can only conduct business related to both current incoterms (2010/2020) and current UCP rules. Why change Incoterms is beyond our comprehension as the change made from 2010 to the 2020 version has very little change worthy of merit.   If another payment aspect is sought  other than prescribed , the doctrine and FTN Exporting process goes against you as  payment and delivery modes have very littles room to allow for ACCEPTABLE variations to apply on this matter. Failing to observe such rules and FTN Exporting  procedures  means the INTERMEDIATE trader will not  ab table to safely close on any such deal, unless they apply to add their own huge sums of  money to the process.If you don’t know how to navigate incoterms and UCP rules to your benefit , your ability to work on such deals for a profit or commission is best said to be Zero. It’s that simple!  
  84. If you have studied the FTNX doctrine, you are an informed PCT and a private commodity trader. One who is trading on documents and is not in possession of goods being sold is a Informed PCT. A PCT must not  deal with anyone applying as a routine in part or combined - improper trading terms such a ‘POP, POF, ICPO, LOI, ASWP, SLC, BCL, PB, RWA, FACILITATOR, BROKER, NCNDA..etc.  To do as much may mean you are dealing with ill informed entities and fake deals. A company may deal in any way they like, we cannot stop people acting foolishly,  but an informed specialist private trader such as a PCT may not entertain or trade in such a manner.Either you (PCT) know and understand why you are doing or not. Unethical traders will also take the  email address of a highly informed trader and add it to their own mailing list to serve the impression  of the ‘ names’ supporting the promotional material being sent out. These entities are also deemed ‘ as fake traders supporting fake dealings.’
  85. INCOTERMS 2010 /2020
  86. Both incoterms are now in effect because UCP DLC issuance rules have not changed.  
  88. FTN exporting as endorsed many trader from 2015 with a USCT number . Such an endorsement means that one like minded and informed commodity trader can recognise another peer trader crossing their path. Such trader have no permission to represent FTNX or SMICE.
  90. Anyone helping a PCT  on a deal  is attached to the PCT as a string member . Here is is an example of a bad often useless type of string: (a) END  BUYER - ISS-ISS-ISS- FTNX-ISS-ISS-ISS-ISS-ISS-ISS-SUPPLIER  Here is an example of the perfect string (b)  END BUYER -–FTNX– SUPPLIER. A reasonable  string  is  (c) END BUYER–ISS– FTNX– ISS–SUPPLIER. When string deals  are formed by FTNX ( the PCT) all participants also drop the intermediary tag  which is replaced wth the ISS tag ( International Sourcing Specialist)  its has become very clear  in the last 10 years that (b) and (c) are the acceptable aspect . Having 3 or 4 deals taking pace where a combination of (b) and (c) are in play   is a far better aspect than have a long string like (a) in effect ( we have sen even longer strings). FTNX is the Seller  to the end buyer  and BUYER to the supplier. FTNX also must oversee commission payments to it ISS members involved. Long string deals can actually cause such  deals to crash early. An Intermediary  without a PCT attached cannot become involved in live  deals or not ever earn a commission.  
  91. IPG
  92. Irrevocable Payment Guarantee(IPG) is a promissory note  and is used to pay string members commission on a closed deal. Unknown entities conducting a deal  MUST ask for a IPG prior to surrounding any vital information to the PCT  after a quote has been observed if the PCT is intreated to head  the deal.  The IPG is issued , which released all information to the PCT . The IPG is issued with a pro forma Invoice  which must be signed and returned where the deal is closed.  IPG are complex matter that must also be learned by the informed PCT.